Evaluating the outcomes of our actions makes sense. However, there is a cognitive bias where we place too much weight on the outcome and aren’t critical enough of the process by which we reached that outcome. Learning to avoid the outcome bias can help improve the quality of our decision making process.
Human beings tend to be self-evaluative. We look back at what we’ve done and try to measure ourselves against that in the future. This can be a very useful trait – it enables us to learn lessons from the past and recycle them for the future. Unfortunately, it can also be a problem.
Hindsight is not always 20-20. In fact, we have a tendency to place too much importance on the outcome of a decision than the process by which we made that decision. So when we make a bad decision that results in a poor outcome we are much more likely to be self-critical than we make a bad decision that results in either a neutral or a positive outcome.
In the extreme, if you took all your decisions based on the flip of a coin for a week and the vast majority of outcomes were positive because of that – you might decide that flipping a coin was a good way of making decisions. (When it clearly isn’t).
What is Outcome Bias
Outcome bias is a cognitive bias that enables us to judge our decision making based on the results of the process rather than the quality of the process itself.
You see this a lot with poor managers. A manager who makes a decision based on “gut instinct” - when his team are strongly advising him in one direction and the manager goes in the opposite direction - is going to consider their process to be a good one if they get a positive outcome from it. When in fact, if the team’s rationale was sound it would have been better to have listened to the team.
Author/Copyright holder: Jack Hagley. Copyright terms and licence: All rights reserved.
Whereas if their decision resulted in a poor outcome – they would be more likely to listen to their team in future.
Overcoming the Outcome Bias
It’s important for us to be truly critical in the way we evaluate our actions. Instead of focusing on outcomes, we need to focus on the process as a whole.
- What led us to take the decision?
- What information did we or didn’t we have at that point?
- Was there a better process that we could have followed to make the decision?
- Could we have consulted other people?
- Could we have obtained more data?
- Was there any need to make the decision when we made it?
By evaluating the process as well as the outcome – we can make better decisions in the future.
If you want another extreme example of the outcome bias working at its most negative – consider the drunk driver. When they leave the pub or bar with a skin-full of alcohol in them; they probably know it’s a bad idea to drive drunk – particularly the first time that they do so.
However, if their drunk driving does not result in an accident (and not all drunk drivers do have accidents) then they are more likely to drive drunk in the future. The outcome of their action had no negative consequences – so, to them, there’s nothing wrong with repeating the action.
Yet, as we all know; drunk driving is a bad idea. Any decision making process that leads to drunk driving outside of an extreme emergency is flawed. Critical evaluation of the decision making process is more likely to deter the drunk driver in the future than focusing on the outcome.
Author/Copyright holder: Dollar Photo Club. Copyright terms and licence: All rights reserved.
Like many other cognitive biases, it can be hard to tackle outcome bias by yourself. Asking the kinds of question to examine the decision process in enough detail can be challenging; we may have a tendency to stop too early or to ignore data that we don’t like. If you find that this is the case for you – you should consider working with a coach who can help you get to the bottom of the bias and address it in future.
What's the difference between the focusing effect and the outcome bias?
The outcome bias could be considered a particular type of focusing effect. Where the focus is all based on a previous succesful outcome (irrespective of the value of the process followed to reach that outcome). However, the piece of information that is focused on when the focusing effect comes into play could be any piece of information (usually the first recieved) rather than always relating to previous outcomes.
The Take Away
Outcome bias is a problem because it leads us to repeat poor decision making based on outcomes rather than on the process used to obtain the outcome. The consequences of this are not always severe (or the bias would not exist) but they can be. It is almost always better to make an informed decision than to make a decision based on gut feelings, in haste, etc. as this gives you a much higher chance of a successful outcome.
You can find Baron and Hershey’s paper here: Baron, Jonathan; Hershey, John C. (1988). "Outcome bias in decision evaluation" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54
An interesting insight into how outcome bias can influence ethical decision making from Harvard Business School here: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/08-080.pdf
A look at how outcome bias can affect clinical decision making in health care too: https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/outcome-bias-in-clinical-decision-making-and-the-assessment-of-our-peers/
For a look at biases in a UX context try the Man with No Blog here: http://manwithnoblog.com/2013/10/18/biases-ux-validation-and-goob/
Hero Image: Author/Copyright holder: Unknown. Copyright terms and licence: Unknown.