Breakdowns

At the heart of learning theory lies the concept of breakdowns. When trying something for the first time (e.g. riding a bike) you experience breakdowns in your use of the bike (leaning too much to one side will cause you to loose your balance), and we use these breakdowns to experiment with reality. When something goes wrong (a breakdown) we are given an opportunity to learn as the breakdown reminds us of the discrepancy between our actions or expectations and the world.

A breakdown causes a shift of focus. For example, when searching an online database for scientic articles your internet connnection dies (you experience a breakdown in the use of your tool, which is the internet/the database/or likewise). Before your internet connection stopped working, you were not particularly concious about the connection but focused on finding articles in the database. The breakdown of the tool brought about a shift of focus from the finding of articles to the workings of the internet connection (or rather, how to get it working again).

This is related to Heidegger's notion that objects and properties are not inherent in the world, but arise only in an event of breaking down, in which they change from "ready-to-hand" to "present-at-hand" (Winograd and Flores, 1986). When an object such as your internet connection is ready-to-hand, your are using it to fullfil your objective (finding an article) without conscious reflection. Only in the event of a breakdown, your internet connection becomes "present-at-hand", i.e. you conciously reflect on it instead of focussing on finding articles. Before the breakdown you had given no thought to the presence of a TCP/IP protocol stack on your computer, but now it emerges as a very relevant and important part of your activity.

Breakdowns can be used constructively in the design process and are not a negative situations to be avoided. Instead, a breakdown is "a situation of non-obviousness" (Winograd, and Flores, 1986: p.165). The breakdown uncovers an aspect of the design task and is a source of learning.

What do YOU think?

Give us your opinion! Do you have any comments/additions that you would like other visitors to see?

Comment Himanshu Kapoor says: Dec 4th, 2007
#1
TRUE. Breakdown can also be used as analysis technique. Take a case with web pages. The primary focus area and the breakdowns (area) that disrupts attention to relevant information. A subject of usability concern and quantification.
 
comment You say: Mar 17th, 2010
#2
Your text will appear here ! 

  will be spam-protected
 

 
How many?
=
e.g. "6"
 

References (bibliography)

 what's this?

Lee, L. (1992): The Day The Phones Stopped. New York, Donald I. Fine, Inc

Papert, Seymour (1980): Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York, Basic Books
 View info on Amazon.com or .co.uk This link opens in a new window 

Popper, Karl R. (1965): Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York, Harper and Row
 View info on Amazon.com or .co.uk This link opens in a new window 

Schön, Donald (1988): Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward A New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
 View info on Amazon.com or .co.uk This link opens in a new window 

Simon, Herbert A. (1981): The Sciences of the Artificial (2nd. ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press

Winograd, Terry and Flores, Fernando (1987): Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Reading MA, Addison-Wesley Publishing
 View info on Amazon.com or .co.uk This link opens in a new window 

Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K. and Ostwald, J. (year unknown): A New Understanding of Design and Its Computational Support. Unpublished work, but may be published in the future through University of Colorado

Changes to this page

Get Notified!

Get notified when new entries are added to the encyclopedia!
Your Email
Want to know more?
Mar 17

More and more we're being asked to live with technology that is technically reliable, because it was created to fit our knowledge of the physical world, but that is so complex or so counterintuitive that it's actually unusable by most human beings.

-- Kim Vicente, The Human Factor, p. 17.

  • Share this quote on... Bookmark and Share
  • Get more quotes

Eva Hornecker on Tangible Interaction

Eva Hornecker explains the evolving concept of Tangible Interaction.

Read Eva's insightful entry here..

Licensed through a Creative Commons licence Open Content

We believe in Open Content and use the Creative Commons Copyright Licences, which makes the content of this website in effect the property of our community, not of this specific website. This page/work is copyright of Interaction-Design.org through the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence.
Permission to make digital/hard copy of part or all of this work for personal, classroom, and commercial use is granted without fee provided that appropriate credit is given (i.e. that the author's name, the title of this publication/article/web page, its URL and its date clearly appear) and that derivative works are also made available through the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence. See the copyright page for full details or click the 'how to cite' link above for info on how to cite this publication/article/web page.
 

Page information

Author(s): Mads Soegaard
How to cite/reference this page
URL: http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/breakdowns.html