About Contact Help us

HCI, User Experience, Information Architecture, Usability, and more

“It is easy for me to access this knowledge pool, I want it to grow so that I can grow along”

---Maria Hull

Last 3 Donors

1. Stephen J. Kidd

2. Maria Hull

3. Rosemary J. Bennett

...more generous donors

Support us

Funding progress for 2010:

References

Psychological Review

Printer-friendly

How to cite

Psychological Review

Publisher:

Description:

No description available... Please help other visitors by providing one!

ADD DESCRIPTION

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Example publications from this periodical

The following articles are from "Psychological Review":

-- Volume 63 --

Miller, George A. (1956): The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. In Psychological Review, 63 pp. 81-97

-- Volume 89 --

Issue 5

Meyer, David E., Smith, J. E. Keith and Wright, Charles E. (1982): Models for the Speed and Accuracy of Aimed Movements. In Psychological Review, 89 (5) pp. 449-482

-- Volume 94 --

Biederman, Irving (1987): Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. In Psychological Review, 94 pp. 115-147

-- Volume 99 --

Bock, K., Loebell, H. and Morey, R. (1992): From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. In Psychological Review, 99 pp. 150-171

-- Volume 106 --

Issue 4

Pirolli, Peter and Card, Stuart K. (1999): Information foraging. In Psychological Review, 106 (4) pp. 643-675

-- Volume 113 --

Issue 3

Gray, Wayne D., Sims, Chris R., Fu, Wai-Tat and Schoelles, Michael J. (2006): The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. In Psychological Review, 113 (3) pp. 461-482

“Soft constraints hypothesis (SCH) is a rational analysis approach that holds that the mixture of perceptual-motor and cognitive resources allocated for interactive behavior is adjusted based on temporal cost-benefit tradeoffs. Alternative approaches maintain that cognitive resources are in some sense protected or conserved in that greater amounts of perceptual-motor effort will be expended to conserve lesser amounts of cognitive effort. One alternative, the minimum memory hypothesis (MMH), holds that people favor strategies that minimize the use of memory. SCH is compared with MMH across 3 experiments and with predictions of an Ideal Performer Model that uses ACT-R’s memory system in a reinforcement learning approach that maximizes expected utility by minimizing time. Model and data support the SCH view of resource allocation; at the under 1000-millisecond level of analysis, mixtures of cognitive and perceptual-motor resources are adjusted based on their cost-benefit tradeoffs for interactive behavior.”

Copyrights may apply

What do YOU think?

Give us your opinion! Do you have any comments/additions
that you would like other visitors to see?

You say: Mar 19th, 2010

Be the first to add a thoughtful note to this page !

Changes to this page (periodical)

10 Nov 2009: An editor rejected a request to change information
14 Feb 2008: Journal/Periodical was added to the bibliography (approved by an editor)

12 Aug 2007: Journal/Periodical was added to the bibliography (approved by an editor)
08 Aug 2007: Journal/Periodical was added to the bibliography (approved by an editor)
28 May 2003: Added the periodical to the bibliography
28 May 2003: Added the periodical to the bibliography