WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:34.200
You've probably all heard that phrase  "thinking out of the box"; everybody tells you,
"Think out of the box." And it sounds so easy, and yet it's so difficult.
If we're talking about theory and creativity, then
we've got to think about de Bono and lateral thinking.
So, if you're thinking out of the box, then  lateral thinking is...
well, almost – not quite, but almost the same thing in different words.

00:00:34.200 --> 00:01:04.080
And this idea of doing things that are breaking the mold, that are not following a line
obviously covers a lot of creativity techniques,
but particularly lateral thinking, de Bono's lateral thinking.
The idea there is, wherever you are, you've  got your problem, you've got your start point.
Linear thinking, in de Bono's terms, is very much about
trying to follow the standard path, going along.
So, if you're doing mathematics, you  might pull the standard techniques off the shelf;

00:01:04.080 --> 00:01:31.645
if you're writing a poem, you might be thinking line by line and
you're thinking how each line fits and rhymes with the one before
– if you're doing rhyming poetry, that is.
So, it's all about following the same path of reasoning, going on and on.
*Lateral thinking is about trying to expand*; so, instead of following the same path of reasoning,
are there different places to start?
Are there different ways of thinking  from the way, where you are?

00:01:31.645 --> 00:02:02.354
So, it's about trying to expand your idea of where you are *outwards*.
So, that might be thinking of different solution strategies.
So, it might be thinking of different ways to start.
Crucially, though, if you want to see out of the box
– or get out of the box, you actually often need to see the box.
If you're literally in a cardboard box, you know you're in it, but...
*mental boxes* – you don't actually know you're in them.
It's not that there's a cardboard wall and you don't go beyond it;

00:02:02.354 --> 00:02:31.497
it's more like a hall of mirrors, so you never realize there's anything
outside at all.
Sometimes *unusual examples* can help you see that.
And that's, again, part of the reason  for the Bad Ideas method, like Random Metaphors;
things that – as soon as you've got something that isn't in the box,
even if it's not a very good thing,
it helps you to realize – you can say, "Well, *why* isn't this a good solution?
Why doesn't it work as a solution?"

00:02:31.497 --> 00:03:00.217
And as you answer that question about why, what you're doing is you're *naming* that cardboard wall.
And once you've named the cardboard wall and you know it's there,
you can start to think of what might be outside of that box but perhaps is a better solution.
If you think about some of the analytic methods combining those, those are about
building a map of the territory, which is very much about naming the box,
naming the walls, naming the boundaries.
And by naming them, by seeing from a distance what is there,

00:03:00.217 --> 00:03:30.301
being able to then think of alternative solutions that are completely different.
So, both alternative solutions help you to see the territory, help you to see the box;
of course, by seeing the box, that gives you the potential to have alternative solutions,
and actually you can iterate back and forth between those and hopefully build
a better understanding of what is there and what is constraining you.
If you understand what's constraining you, then  you can start to break those constraints.