About Contact Help us

HCI, User Experience, Information Architecture, Usability, and more

“Thank you for making great encyclopedia articles free to al”

---Jean Baker

Last 3 Donors

1. Stephen J. Kidd

2. Maria Hull

3. Rosemary J. Bennett

...more generous donors

Support us

Funding progress for 2010:

References

Authors

Tom Djajadiningrat

Printer-friendly

How to cite

Tom Djajadiningrat

Update pic

About the author:
No description available of Tom Djajadiningrat...

ADD DESCRIPTION

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

ADD PUBLICATION

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

SHARE YOUR RESEARCH

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Tom Djajadiningrat (bibliography)

» 2007 «

Edit | Del

Djajadiningrat, Tom, Matthews, Ben and Stienstra, Marcelle A. (2007): Easy doesn't do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (8) pp. 657-676

Edit | Del

Djajadiningrat, Tom and Kyffin, Steven (2007): Disintermediating the PC: a product centric view on Web 2.0. In: Koskinen, Ilpo and Keinonen, Turkka (eds.) DPPI 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces August 22-25, 2007, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 516-519. Available online

» 2005 «

Edit | Del

Jensen, Mads Vedel, Buur, Jacob and Djajadiningrat, Tom (2005): Designing the user actions in tangible interaction. In: Bertelsen, Olav W., Bouvin, Niels Olof, Krogh, Peter Gall and Kyng, Morten (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing 2005 August 20-24, 2005, Aarhus, Denmark. pp. 9-18. Available online

Used on the following page:

» Tangible Interaction: [/encyclopedia/tangible_interaction.html]

» 2004 «

Edit | Del

Buur, Jacob, Jensen, Mads Vedel and Djajadiningrat, Tom (2004): Hands-only scenarios and video action walls: novel methods for tangible user interaction design. In: Proceedings of DIS04: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 2004. pp. 185-192. Available online

“In our research on tangible user interaction we focus on the design of products that are dedicated to a particular user, task and context. In doing so, we are interested in strengthening the actions side of tangible interaction. Currently, the actions required by electronic products are limited to pushing, sliding and rotating. Yet humans are capable of far more complex actions: Human dexterity is highly refined. This focus on actions requires a reconsideration of the design process. In this paper we propose two design methods that potentially boost the focus on skilled actions in the design of tangible user interaction: The Hands-Only Scenario is a 'close-up version' of the dramatised use scenario. It helps focus effort on what we imagine the hands of the users doing. The Video Action Wall is a technique of 'live post-its' on a (projected) computer screen. Little snippets of action videos running simultaneously help designers understand user actions by the qualities they represent.”

Copyrights may apply

Edit | Del

Wensveen, Stephan, Overbeeke, Kees, Djajadiningrat, Tom and Kyffin, Steven (2004): Freedom of fun, freedom of interaction. In Interactions, 11 (5) pp. 59-61

Edit | Del

Djajadiningrat, Tom, Wensveen, Stephan, Frens, Joep and Overbeeke, Kees (2004): Tangible Products: redressing the balance between appearance and action. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8 (5) pp. 294-309

Used on the following page:

» Tangible Interaction: [/encyclopedia/tangible_interaction.html]

» 2003 «

Edit | Del

Pedersen, Jesper, Buur, Jacob and Djajadiningrat, Tom (2003): Field Design Sessions: Augmenting Whose Reality?. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16 (3) pp. 461-476

“The authors present a design case in which field design sessions are introduced to bridge the designers' imagination and the users' knowledge of the use context. This approach entailed immersing design teams in the environment of the product-to-be during the conceptual design phase. With a background in the Scandinavian tradition of participatory or cooperative design, the design team observed and talked to users, sketched and produced mock-ups, acted out scenarios, and received user feedback during these field trips. Moving the design into the field provided the team with a number of advantages compared with traditional work in the design studio based on user field observations. Designers achieved direct physical experience of the circumstances and a nonrepresented, nonabstracted introduction to the problems at hand. Through on-the-spot mock-up design and user collaboration, valuable insights into the essence of work and use were gained, and design suggestions embodied by these mock-ups were put on the line. Being aware or unaware of it, these suggestions contained personal assumptions, and preconceived opinions or hypotheses about use and use context, but also contained suggestions of applied technology. The result was new valuable insights toward an understanding of what work really is (or is not) and how it could be supported (or not supported) in the future. It is argued that, to make the most of augmented reality (AR) in the design of professional tools, knowledge of the state of the art of technology is a prerequisite, but is not in itself sufficient. It needs to be complemented by design approaches that (a) provide insight about the users, their work practice, and use context and (b) support designers in aligning their viewpoints with the viewpoints and experienced reality of the people for whom they are designing. This may form a cornerstone in the successful application of emerging technologies. This article discusses existing human-computer interaction approaches aimed at engaging the field in design, contrasts them with field design sessions, reflects on the advantages of applying them, and draws attention to a number of method points.”

Copyrights may apply

» 2002 «

Edit | Del

Djajadiningrat, Tom, Overbeeke, Kees and Wensveen, Stephan (2002): But how, Donald, tell us how?: on the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. In: Proceedings of DIS02: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 2002. pp. 285-291. Available online

Edit | Del

Wensveen, Stephan, Overbeeke, Kees and Djajadiningrat, Tom (2002): Push me, shove me and I show you how you feel: recognising mood from emotionally rich interaction. In: Proceedings of DIS02: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 2002. pp. 335-340. Available online

“The mood or emotional state you are in colours the way you interact with people and systems. Future interactive systems need to recognise emotional aspects in order to be truly adaptive. We designed an alarm clock, which elicits rich expressive behaviour and demonstrated that it is able to read your mood from the way you set it. We validated film clips, used them to induce moods after which participants had to set the alarm clock. From the dynamic setting behaviour we inferred parameters from which we calculated equations to identify the mood. The results illustrate the importance of a tight coupling between action and appearance in interaction design, through freedom of interaction and matching inherent feedback.”

Copyrights may apply

Edit | Del

Djajadiningrat, Tom and Buur, Jacob (2002): Look mama, with hands!: on tangible interaction, gestures and learning. In: Proceedings of DIS02: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 2002. p. 417. Available online

» 2000 «

Edit | Del

Wensveen, Stephan, Overbeeke, Kees and Djajadiningrat, Tom (2000): Touch Me, Hit Me and I Know How You Feel: A Design Approach to Emotionally Rich Interaction. In: Proceedings of DIS00: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 2000. pp. 48-52. Available online

“In this paper we propose a 3-step method for designing emotionally rich interactions, illustrated by the design of an alarm clock. By emotionally rich interaction we understand interaction that heavily relies on emotion expressed through action. The method addresses three questions: What are the relevant emotional aspects for a context for experience? How can a product recognise and express these aspects? How should the product adapt its behaviour to the user on the basis of this information? The essence of our approach is that a product not only elicits emotionally expressive actions, but that the feedback is inextricably linked to these actions. The feedback should be inherent to the design, and not gratuitously added.”

Copyrights may apply

ADD PUBLICATION

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

SHOW THIS LIST ON YOUR HOMEPAGE

What do YOU think?

Give us your opinion! Do you have any comments/additions
that you would like other visitors to see?

You say: Mar 21st, 2010

Be the first to add a thoughtful note to this page !

Changes to this page (author)

23 Feb 2010: Enabled abstracts to be shown on Tom Djajadiningrat's author page.
17 Aug 2009: Article in Journal/Periodical was added to the page

01 Jun 2009: Author was edited
31 May 2009: Author was edited
31 May 2009: Author was edited
08 May 2009: Author was edited
10 Dec 2007: Added a picture of Tom Djajadiningrat
26 Jul 2007: Author was edited
29 Jun 2007: Author was edited
22 Jun 2007: Author was edited
22 Jun 2007: Author was edited
22 Jun 2007: Author was edited
22 Jun 2007: Author was edited
22 Jun 2007: Author was added to the bibliography

Publication statistics

Publication period:2000-2007
Publication count:11
Number of co-authors:9

Productive colleagues

Tom Djajadiningrat's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

Jacob Buur:21
Kees Overbeeke:18
Stephan Wensveen:11

Collaboration count

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

Stephan Wensveen:5
Kees Overbeeke:5
Jacob Buur:4

Other options

Learn more about Tom Djajadiningrat:
- Google Scholar
- ACM
- CSB

Conference Calendar

Mar 22

Workshop on Pervasive healthcare in the home : Supporting patient motivation and engagement

Mar 22

UX People

Mar 22

ETRA '10 - Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symp.

Mar 21

“ Software design is the act of determining the user's experience with a piece of software. It has nothing to do with how the code works inside, or how big or small the code is. The designer's task is to specify completely and unambiguously the user's whole experience. ”

-- David Liddle, From Bringing Design to Software, edited by Terry Winograd, 1996 ”

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes

Eva Hornecker on Tangible Interaction

Eva Hornecker explains the evolving concept of Tangible Interaction.

Read Eva's insightful entry here..

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Last 3 Donors

Support us

Tom Djajadiningrat

Publications by Tom Djajadiningrat (bibliography)

» 2007 «

» 2005 «

» 2004 «

» 2003 «

» 2002 «

» 2000 «

What do YOU think?

Changes to this page (author)

Publication statistics

Productive colleagues

Collaboration count

Other options

Conference Calendar

Eva Hornecker on Tangible Interaction

Help us help you!

Page information