Calendar

May 20

CTS 2013 - The 2013 Intl. Conf. on Collaboration Techn. and Systems

May 22

Knowing (by) Designing 2013

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 19

“ Design can be art. Design can be aesthetics. Design is so simple, that's why it is so complicated. ”

-- Paul Rand, 1997

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Tetsu Fujisaki

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Tetsu Fujisaki (bibliography)

1991

Edit | Del

Wolf, Catherine G., Glasser, Andria R. and Fujisaki, Tetsu (1991): An Evaluation of Recognition Accuracy for Discrete and Run-On Writing. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1991. pp. 359-363.

“In an effort to reach markets in which a keyboard/mouse interface is difficult or inconvenient to use, manufacturers are now beginning to introduce light-weight portable computers which recognize hand-printed characters. The recognition accuracy that these new computers are able to achieve will be a critical factor in determining their acceptance by users. There are, however, few published studies of handwriting recognition accuracy and the variables which affect accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess recognition accuracy as a function of a number of factors which might vary in the real-world use of handwriting recognition systems. These factors included style of writing, amount of training, interval of disuse, and alphabet. The findings suggested that recognition accuracy reached a steady-state level with a relatively small amount of training and remained at that level for as long as a month (the longest interval tested in this study). For an 82-character alphabet, character recognition accuracy was 92.7% for discrete writing and 87.6% for run-on writing. Accuracy with alphabets restricted to digits or uppercase only was quite high, with mean recognition rates ranging from 95% to”

Edit | Del

Kimura, Takayuki Dan, Golin, Eric J., Eller, Marlin, Meyrowitz, Norman K., Fujisaki, Tetsu, Yaskawa, Yoji, Muto, Ryujiro, Altabet, Saul, Citrin, Wayne and Kim, Jin Hyung (1991): Pen-Based User Interface. In: VL 1991 1991. pp. 168-173.

Add publication