Calendar

May 22

Knowing (by) Designing 2013

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 20

“ The moment clients realize that revisions are not an all-you-can-eat buffet, suddenly they realize they are not hungry. ”

-- Lester Beall

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Paul Ray

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Paul Ray (bibliography)

1994

Edit | Del

Farley, Richard S., Bishop, Phillip A. and Ray, Paul (1994): Evaluation of Half-Mask Gas Collection for Metabolic Measurement in the Workplace. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting 1994. pp. 1109-1112.

“Metabolic measurement is often important in job design and research. Metabolic measurement via indirect spirometry has traditionally used a mouth-piece nose-clip headgear (MNH) method of collecting expired gases. MNH is often uncomfortable, prohibits oral communication, may fail because of loss of nose-clip, and may interfere with or alter some work tasks because of the awkwardness of the headgear. Gas collection masks (MASK) offer the possibility of partially or totally alleviating the problems of MNH but increase the possibility of erroneous measure due to leakage. This study compared the measurement of performance and subject's subjective ratings of a typical MNH vs. MASK (Hans Rudolph model 8900 series) over a range of work loads from light to maximal in 20 well-trained subjects (M=12, F=8). Ventilation (Ve), oxygen uptake (VOW), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were collected with a Sensormedics MMC-1, and heart rate (HR) with a Polar Heartwatch. Comfort was assessed with a Likert questionnaire. Results from the final work rate are shown below: Variable Ve VO2 RER HR (L/min) (ml/kg/min) (bpm) MNH 105,217 52.2 1.13 187 MASK 115,281 56.6 1.09 187 Results show this MASK produced values as high as the MNH with greater subject comfort at both peak and sub-maximal work. The observed Ve in the MASK condition suggests that leakage was not problematic and there could be a tendency for the MNH to actually impede the measurement. Based on previous preliminary studies and these data, careful use of the MASK is recommended over MNH for work place metabolic or other ventilatory measurements.”

Add publication