About Contact Help us

Join us ! Publish !

Interaction Design Foundation

Free educational materials - made by the world's technology elite

About sponsorships

References

Marshall B. Jones

iPad and tablet version

Publication statistics

Pub. period:1987-2004
Pub. count:4
Number of co-authors:4

Co-authors

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

Robert S. Kennedy:3
Kay M. Stanney:1
Lois A. Kuntz:1

Productive colleagues

Marshall B. Jones's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

Kay M. Stanney:37
Robert S. Kennedy:33
Dennis R. Baltzley:2

Calendar

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 29

Intl. Workshop on Design and Spontaneity in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (DS-CSCL 2013)

May 22

“ User error: replace user and press any key to continue. ”

-- Popular computer one-liner

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Marshall B. Jones

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Marshall B. Jones (bibliography)

2004

Edit | Del

Jones, Marshall B., Kennedy, Robert S. and Stanney, Kay M. (2004): Toward Systematic Control of Cybersickness. In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13 (5) pp. 589-600.

1995

Edit | Del

Jones, Marshall B. and Kennedy, Robert S. (1995): A Temporal Factors Battery for Studying Individual Differences in Perception. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting 1995. pp. 892-896.

“Individual differences in perception have drawn increased attention from training and task-performance communities. If perceptual tests are to be utilized to train, predict, or optimize performance, then they need to be studied and evaluated as differential measures. In this study, the reliability and individual differences for a perceptual test battery (seven tasks) were investigated. The participants (10 males, 11 females) completed five trials of the test battery within a ten day span. In general, the results of this study are positive. Six of the seven tasks showed sizable individual differences and four of the seven were reliable. The three tasks that showed unreliability have since been modified and need to be formally studied.”

1988

Edit | Del

Jones, Marshall B. (1988): Slope-Controlled Performance Testing. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting 1988. pp. 836-837.

“Cognitive-ability tests, though promising in other respects, generally show pronounced practice effects and have weak test-retest reliabilities. One reason for the low reliabilities appears to be that practice effects themselves vary from individual to individual, so that subjects differ not only in the levels at which they are performing when testing ends but also in the slopes leading up to those levels. Since slope of the performance curve late in practice has been shown to affect performance at reacquisition (retest), uncontrolled variation in slope may lower test-retest reliability. A possible approach to this problem is experimentally to control slope during testing so that all subjects are improving at roughly the same rates when testing ends. The expected effect is that, with inter-subject differences in slope controlled, the temporal stability of cognitive-ability tests will improve. If temporal stability improves, however, predictive validities ought also to improve.”

1987

Edit | Del

Jones, Marshall B., Kennedy, Robert S., Kuntz, Lois A. and Baltzley, Dennis R. (1987): Isoperformance: Trading Off Selection, Training, and Equipment Variations to Maintain the Same Level of Systems Performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting 1987. pp. 634-637.

“This paper details an Air Force sponsored project known as Isoperformance. Isoperformance (iso meaning same) is a conceptual approach to human factors engineering. The focus of isoperformance is that the same level of performance can be attained by different combinations of personnel, training, and equipment. This goal is, once these combinations have been determined, a choice among them can be made in terms of maximum feasibility or minimum cost. The program takes into account human engineering, personnel, and training research. The specific focus of this paper will be the interactive computer program. Input to the isoperformance program, made by the user, includes the system, the task, a quantified definition of proficient performance as well as other specifications.”

Add publication