Jun 19

... there are no simple 'right' answers for most web design questions (at least not for the important ones). What works is good, integrated design that fills a need--carefully thought out, well executed, and tested.

-- Steve Krug, Don't Make Me Think, p. 136

 
 

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

 
 

Latest books

The Social Design of Technical Systems: Building technologies for communities
by Brian Whitworth and Adnan Ahmad

 
Start reading

The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.
by Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam

 
Start reading
 
 

Help us help you!

 
 

M. Gregory Smith

Add description
Add publication

Publications by M. Gregory Smith (bibliography)

 what's this?
1995
 
Edit | Del

Eisler, Leslie R., Smith, M. Gregory and Booth, Lewie E. (1995): System Safety Analysis of the Yucca Mountain Tunnel Boring Machine. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting 1995. p. 933.

The purpose of the analysis was to systematically identify and evaluate potential hazards to personnel related to the design and use of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project, Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF), Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM). The analysis was performed in accordance with MIL-STD-882C, System Safety Program Requirements. The analysis required three steps -- hazard/scenario identification, consequence assessment, and frequency assessment. The result was a "risk evaluation" of events, breakdowns, incidents, or other occurrences that may have a negative effect on personnel safety. Four techniques were used to aid in the identification and analysis of hazards -- Scenario Analysis; Hazards Analysis; Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis; and Human Factors Engineering Analysis. A Process Evaluation Tree Analysis was also performed to confirmed that there was at least one scenario for each hazard and one mitigation feature for each scenario. Once the hazards were identified they were placed in context by developing scenarios that illustrated how the hazards could harm personnel. Each scenario contained at least one mitigation feature to mitigate the hazard; most scenarios contained more than one mitigation feature. For each scenario a hazard frequency, a consequence, and an overall risk rating was established. Risk was defined as a function of frequency and consequence. Five frequency categories and four consequence categories were used to generate a five by four, or 20 cell, risk matrix. Each cell was assigned a qualitative risk rating -- high, medium, low, extremely low. Since a significant portion of the analysis was performed after the design had been completed hazard mitigation relied heavily on design retrofits and the development of training and procedures.

© All rights reserved Eisler et al. and/or Human Factors Society

 
Add publication
Show list on your website
 
 

Join the technology elite and advance:

 
1.

Your career

 
2.

Your network

 
 3.

Your skills

 
 
 
 
 
 

Changes to this page (author)

27 Jun 2007: Added

Page Information

Page maintainer: The Editorial Team
URL: http://www.interaction-design.org/references/authors/m__gregory_smith.html
Jun 19

... there are no simple 'right' answers for most web design questions (at least not for the important ones). What works is good, integrated design that fills a need--carefully thought out, well executed, and tested.

-- Steve Krug, Don't Make Me Think, p. 136

 
 

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

 
 

Latest books

The Social Design of Technical Systems: Building technologies for communities
by Brian Whitworth and Adnan Ahmad

 
Start reading

The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.
by Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam

 
Start reading
 
 

Help us help you!