About Contact Help us

Join us ! Publish !

Interaction Design Foundation

Free educational materials - made by the world's technology elite

About sponsorships

References

Kevin M. Corker

iPad and tablet version

Publication statistics

Pub. period:1994-2001
Pub. count:4
Number of co-authors:7

Co-authors

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

Emilie M. Roth:2
Melvin H. Lipner:1
Marilyn S. Bunzo:1

Productive colleagues

Kevin M. Corker's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

Mark T. Maybury:23
Emilie M. Roth:21
Angel R. Puerta:18

Calendar

May 22

Knowing (by) Designing 2013

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 21

“ Computer analyst to programmer: "You start coding. I'll go find out what they want." ”

-- Popular computer one-liner

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Kevin M. Corker

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Kevin M. Corker (bibliography)

2001

Edit | Del

Corker, Kevin M. (2001): University briefs: San Jose State University. In Interactions, 8 (2) pp. 105-108.

1997

Edit | Del

Miller, Christopher A., Corker, Kevin M., Maybury, Mark T. and Puerta, Angel R. (1997): Computational Approaches to Interface Design: What Works, What Doesn't, What Should and What Might. In: Moore, Johanna D., Edmonds, Ernest and Puerta, Angel R. (eds.) International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 1997 January 6-9, 1997, Orlando, Florida, USA. pp. 123-126.

“Tools which make use of computational processes -- mathematical, algorithmic and/or knowledge-based -- to perform portions of the design, evaluation and/or construction of interfaces have become increasingly available and powerful. Nevertheless, there is little agreement as to the appropriate role for a computational tool to play in the interface design process. Current tools fall into broad classes depending on which portions, and how much, of the design process they automate. The purpose of this panel is to view and generalize about computational approaches developed to date, discuss the tasks which for which they are suited, and suggest methods to enhance their utility and acceptance. Panel participants represent a wide diversity of application domains and methodologies. This should provide for lively discussion about implementation approaches, accuracy of design decisions, acceptability of representational tradeoffs and the optimal role for a computational tool to play in the interface design process.”

1994

Edit | Del

Roth, Emilie M. and Corker, Kevin M. (1994): Analysis and Modeling of Use of Procedures in Dynamic Worlds: Implications for the Design of Computer-Based Procedures. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting 1994. p. 194.

“In dynamic high risk environments, such as aviation, air traffic control, and nuclear power plant operations, when emergencies arise, the burden of diagnosing and developing a response strategy in real time can be very high. One response to this problem that has been adopted in a number of domains is to develop preplanned response strategies in the form of procedures that the person-on-the-scene is expected to follow in dealing with the emergency. This symposium examines the cognitive demands inherent in responding to emergencies when procedures are available, and the implications for development of computer-based procedures and related decision-support systems.”

Edit | Del

Hoecker, Douglas G., Corker, Kevin M., Roth, Emilie M., Lipner, Melvin H. and Bunzo, Marilyn S. (1994): Man-Machine Design and Analysis System (MIDAS) Applied to a Computer-Based Procedure-Aiding System. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting 1994. pp. 195-199.

“Difficult issues in design criteria confront the designers of human-computer interaction (HCI) implementations for future power plant control rooms. Such HCI-intensive control-room elements include "soft" controls and displays, computerized procedures, alarm presentations, and support for cooperative information-sharing among crewmembers. This shift in technology, from dedicated controls and displays in fixed locations to multifunction computer-driven operator workstations and wall displays, must focus not only on the required functionality of these interfaces, but also on their crafting and integration in such a way as to minimize the likelihood of operator error. With the objective of providing early insight into the cognitively error-prone consequences of selected interface dynamics, we are adapting a computer-based cognitive modeling tool, the Man-machine Integrated Design and Analysis System (MIDAS), to quantitatively model certain user requirements for operating different types of interfaces while dealing with high-consequence events in a control room setting. MIDAS was conceived and is being developed as a joint Army/NASA program a the NASA Ames Research Center to test different design approaches to computerizing the cockpits of advanced commercial and military aircraft This report presents preliminary results from a project to adapt the MIDAS tool to the nuclear control room domain. These results have enabled comparative observation of cognitive loading depending on whether a supervisor uses computerized procedures or paper procedures to direct crew response to a plant trip event. The results suggest that each technology for procedural support, in its current respective implementation, has its own strengths and weaknesses at different points in the control task dialog.”

Add publication