About Contact Help us

HCI, User Experience, Information Architecture, Usability, and more

“I use free sources like Interaction-Design.org so often that I have an obligation to recognize its value and support its continued presence”

---Stephen J. Kidd

Last 3 Donors

1. Stephen J. Kidd

2. Maria Hull

3. Rosemary J. Bennett

...more generous donors

Support us

Funding progress for 2010:

References

Authors

Karen Albrecht

Printer-friendly

How to cite

Karen Albrecht

About the author:
No description available of Karen Albrecht...

ADD DESCRIPTION

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

ADD PUBLICATION

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

SHARE YOUR RESEARCH

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Karen Albrecht (bibliography)

» 1988 «

Edit | Del

Frese, Michael, Albrecht, Karen, Altmann, Alexandra, Lang, Jutta, Papstein, Patricia Von, Peyerl, Reinhard, Prumper, Jochen, Schulte-Gocking, Heike, Wankmuller, Isabell and Wendel, Rigas (1988): The Effects of an Active Development of the Mental Model in the Training Process: Experimental Results in a Word Processing System. In Behaviour and Information Technology, 7 (3) pp. 295-304

“Three different training programmes for a word processing system were experimentally compared: (1) a sequential programme, which taught low-level skills and which did not help the user actively to develop a mental model, (2) a hierarchical programme, which provided an explicit and integrated conceptual model of the system to the user and (3) a programme in which the users were asked to develop hypotheses on the functioning of the software and in which they were encouraged to use an active and exploratory approach. From an action theory point of view it was hypothesized that the third group would be superior to the first group. In an experimental study with two training sessions each of two hours and a two-hour testing session (n=15), this was shown to be the case for several performance criteria (error time, transfer and experimenter rating). Additionally, an interindividual difference variable to measure the individual learning style was used, giving results that could be interpreted in a similar way to the experimental results.”

Copyrights may apply

ADD PUBLICATION