About Contact Help us

Join us ! Publish !

Interaction Design Foundation

Free educational materials - made by the world's technology elite

About sponsorships

References

Jurgen Koenemann-Belliveau

iPad and tablet version

Publication statistics

Pub. period:1991-1994
Pub. count:5
Number of co-authors:6

Co-authors

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

Mark K. Singley:2
Mary Beth Rosson:2
John M. Carroll:2

Productive colleagues

Jurgen Koenemann-Belliveau's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

John M. Carroll:209
Mary Beth Rosson:142
Thomas G. Moher:24

Calendar

May 20

CTS 2013 - The 2013 Intl. Conf. on Collaboration Techn. and Systems

May 22

Knowing (by) Designing 2013

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 19

“ Design can be art. Design can be aesthetics. Design is so simple, that's why it is so complicated. ”

-- Paul Rand, 1997

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Jurgen Koenemann-Belliveau

see also Juergen Koenemann and Jurgen Koenemann

Edit author info

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Jurgen Koenemann-Belliveau (bibliography)

1994

Edit | Del

Koenemann-Belliveau, Jurgen, Carroll, John M., Rosson, Mary Beth and Singley, Mark K. (1994): Comparative Usability Evaluation: Critical Incidents and Critical Threads. In: Adelson, Beth, Dumais, Susan and Olson, Judith S. (eds.) Proceedings of the ACM CHI 94 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts. pp. 245-251.

“Empirical usability evaluations (particularly formative evaluations [13]) hinge on observing and interpreting critical incidents [8] of use. We proposed [3,5] augmenting critical incident methods by analysis of what we called critical threads: sets of causally related user episodes that, taken together, define major usability themes. This paper extends this work to the comparative usability analysis of a related artifact. We discuss how our earlier claims analysis was used to orient and simplify our current evaluation efforts.”

1993

Edit | Del

Carroll, John M., Koenemann-Belliveau, Jurgen, Rosson, Mary Beth and Singley, Mark K. (1993): Critical Incidents and Critical Themes in Empirical Usability Evaluation. In: Alty, James L., Diaper, Dan and Guest, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth Conference of the British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Specialist Group - People and Computers VIII August 7-10, 1993, Loughborough University, UK. pp. 279-292.

“Empirical usability evaluations (particularly 'formative' evaluations) hinge on observing and interpreting critical incidents of use: the causes of such critical incidents can often be found in the immediate contexts of their occurrence and can guide specific design changes. However, it can also happen that the causes of a critical incident are temporally remote from its context of occurrence or distributed throughout the user's prior experiences. We propose augmenting critical incident methods by analysis of what we call 'critical threads': sets of causally related user episodes that, taken together, define major usability themes.”

1992

Edit | Del

Koenemann-Belliveau, Jurgen (1992): "Psychology of Programming," edited by J.-M. Hoc, T. R. G. Green, R. Samurcay, and D. J. Gilmore. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37 (3) pp. 387-393.

1991

Edit | Del

Koenemann-Belliveau, Jurgen, Moher, Thomas G. and Robertson, Scott P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers 1991, Norwood, New Jersey, USA.

Edit | Del

Riecken, R. Douglas, Koenemann-Belliveau, Jurgen and Robertson, Scott P. (1991): What Do Expert Programmers Communicate by Means of Descriptive Commenting?. In: Koenemann-Belliveau, Jurgen, Moher, Thomas G. and Robertson, Scott P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers 1991, Norwood, New Jersey, USA. pp. 177-195.

“When generating source code, programmers are required to communicate a set of tasks to be performed such that they are interpreted correctly by both a computer and other programmers. We report a study in which expert programmers improved the clarity of a program in an attempt to communicate specific program knowledge to novice programmers. We examined descriptive commenting and addition of white space as methods of communication applied by experts. We discuss plausible factors which motivate the use of these different methods of communication. The results of this study provide insight by which to improve code-based communication between expert and novice programmers.”

Add publication