About Contact Help us

Join us ! Publish !

Interaction Design Foundation

Free educational materials - made by the world's technology elite

About sponsorships

References

Jonathan P. Gluckman

iPad and tablet version

Publication statistics

Pub. period:1988-1993
Pub. count:4
Number of co-authors:7

Co-authors

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

William N. Dember:3
Joel S. Warm:3
Peter A. Hancock:2

Productive colleagues

Jonathan P. Gluckman's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

Joel S. Warm:17
Peter A. Hancock:14
John E. Deaton:8

Calendar

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 29

Intl. Workshop on Design and Spontaneity in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (DS-CSCL 2013)

May 22

“ User error: replace user and press any key to continue. ”

-- Popular computer one-liner

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Jonathan P. Gluckman

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Jonathan P. Gluckman (bibliography)

1993

Edit | Del

Dember, William N., Warm, Joel S., Nelson, W. Todd, Simons, Karen G., Hancock, Peter A. and Gluckman, Jonathan P. (1993): The Rate of Gain of Perceived Workload in Sustained Attention. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting 1993. pp. 1388-1392.

“Perceived workload was measured via the NASA TLX following a visual vigilance task. Five task durations (10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 min) were combined pictorially with two levels of discrimination difficulty (easy, hard) in a between groups design. Detection probability, computed from the final 10 min of watch in each duration condition, varied inversely with signal salience and declined over time. Overall workload varied directly with salience and increased linearly over time. The temporal growth in perceived workload was independent of signal salience. This result suggests that the rate of gain in workload is based upon general features of the vigilance situation rather than specific psychophysical demands such as signal salience.”

1991

Edit | Del

Gluckman, Jonathan P., Morrison, Jeffrey G. and Deaton, John E. (1991): Complex Task Performance as a Basis for Developing Cognitive Engineering Guidelines in Adaptive Automation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1991. pp. 116-120.

“N/R”

Edit | Del

Warm, Joel S., Dember, William N., Gluckman, Jonathan P. and Hancock, Peter A. (1991): Vigilance and Workload. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1991. pp. 980-981.

1988

Edit | Del

Gluckman, Jonathan P., Dember, William N. and Warm, Joel S. (1988): Capacity Demand in Dual-Task Monitoring of Simultaneous and Successive Vigilance Tasks. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting 1988. pp. 1463-1465.

“Parasuraman and Davies (1977) have proposed a taxonomic analysis of vigilance performance which emphasizes the types of discriminations observers are required to make and the information-processing demands placed upon them. According to Parasuraman and Davies, successive (absolute judgement) tasks are more capacity-demanding than simultaneous (comparative judgement) tasks because they invoke working memory. This idea has received support from several investigations demonstrating that psychophysical factors which degrade vigilance performance have more of a negative impact upon successive than upon simultaneous tasks (see Parasuraman, Warm and Dember, 1987 for review). The present study examined the capacity-demand notion further by determining the effects that the two types of tasks have upon one another when they are both performed in a common vigilance session. By doing so, it provides the initial experimental effort to investigate the task dimension of the taxonomy within the context of a previously unexplored aspect of Parasuraman and Davies' classification system, source complexity.”

Add publication