About Contact Help us

Join us ! Publish !

Interaction Design Foundation

Free educational materials - made by the world's technology elite

About sponsorships

References

John M. Findlay

iPad and tablet version

Publication statistics

Pub. period:1988-2000
Pub. count:4
Number of co-authors:9

Co-authors

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

Simon P. Davies:2
Anthony J. Lambert:2
Simon P. Liversedge:1

Productive colleagues

John M. Findlay's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

Simon P. Davies:25
Aidan Feeney:2
Anthony J. Lambert:2

Calendar

May 22

Knowing (by) Designing 2013

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 20

“ The moment clients realize that revisions are not an all-you-can-eat buffet, suddenly they realize they are not hungry. ”

-- Lester Beall

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

John M. Findlay

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by John M. Findlay (bibliography)

2000

Edit | Del

Feeney, Aidan, Hola, Ala K. W., Liversedge, Simon P., Findlay, John M. and Metcalf, Robert (2000): How People Extract Information from Graphs: Evidence from a Sentence-Graph Verification Paradigm. In: Anderson, Michael, Cheng, Peter C-H. and Haarslev, Volker (eds.) Diagrams 2000 - Theory and Application of Diagrams - First International Conference September 1-3, 2000, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. pp. 149-161.

1991

Edit | Del

Scott, D. and Findlay, John M. (1991): Optimum Display Arrangements for Presenting Status Information. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35 (3) pp. 399-407.

“A study utilizing an automated human-computer interface monitoring system is described which investigated the efficacy of two methods of displaying state (insert vs type-over) information within a text-editing system. Information presented only at the cursor position resulted in faster overall performance time than when information was presented only on a status line. The results are discussed in terms of visual processing and cognitive factors.”

1989

Edit | Del

Davies, Simon P., Lambert, Anthony J. and Findlay, John M. (1989): The Effects of the Availability of Menu Information During Command Learning in a Word Processing Application. In Behaviour and Information Technology, 8 (2) pp. 135-144.

“An experiment is reported investigating the transition from relying on an external memory aid for system commands, provided by a permanently visible menu, to relying on internal memory for commands. Menu availability, and the method of command entry (keyboard vs. mouse) were manipulated during the early stages of learning the basic commands required to operate a word processing application. It was found that a group which always had the benefit of a memory aid provided by a menu performed no more efficiently than a group never provided with a menu. A group initially provided with a menu, which was then withdrawn performed significantly more slowly, and with more recourse to help facilities than the later group. When the menu was permanently visible there were no performance differences between the keyboard and mouse methods of command entry. Implications of these findings for interface design are discussed.”

1988

Edit | Del

Findlay, John M., Davies, Simon P., Kentridge, Robert, Lambert, Anthony J. and Kelly, Justine (1988): Optimum Display Arrangements for Presenting Visual Reminders. In: Jones, Dylan M. and Winder, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Specialist Group - People and Computers IV August 5-9, 1988, University of Manchester, UK. pp. 453-464.

“Developments in technology now allow designers to make use of a wide variety of layouts to present material at an interactive terminal. Our understanding of perceptual and cognitive processes shows that various tradeoffs will need consideration in evaluating such layouts (availability of material vs screen clutter; reliance on user memory vs use of reminders etc). We approach these through the framework of attentional switching. We shall report an experimental study which evaluates these tradeoffs in a frequently encountered text editing situation. Our editor may be set to either 'insert' or 'overtype' mode. This information can be displayed with varying prominence in a peripheral window on the screen, displayed as a change of cursor, or omitted from the screen display. We have monitored user interaction at a keystroke level during text editing sessions and show that the different forms of presentation of reminder information can result in substantial differences in performance.”

Add publication