May 20

The moment clients realize that revisions are not an all-you-can-eat buffet, suddenly they realize they are not hungry.

-- Lester Beall

 
 

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

 
 

Help us help you!

 
 

Gail A. Fontenelle

Add description
Add publication

Publications by Gail A. Fontenelle (bibliography)

 what's this?
1988
 
Edit | Del

Laughery, Kenneth R., Jackson, Andrew S. and Fontenelle, Gail A. (1988): Isometric Strength Tests: Predicting Performance in Physically Demanding Transport Tasks. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting 1988. pp. 695-699.

A study explored the applicability of a battery of four isometric strength tests to steward, utility and warehouse jobs in a company that services offshore drilling and production facilities in the petroleum industry. The jobs involve frequently transporting materials up stairs, a category of tasks not prominent in situations where these tests have previously been applied. A job analysis established critical task requirements such as procedures, weights, distances, sizes of containers, etc. An experiment was then carried out with 25 male and 25 female subjects. The subjects performed two self-paced job-related tasks: transporting a 15.9 kg box up and down stairs and similarly transporting a 22.7 kg box. Measures included heart rate and amount of work performed, which, along with known task parameters was used to calculate work power. Subjects also performed four standard isometric strength tests: grip, arm lift, back lift and arm press. Correlations between job task and strength performance indicated these tests are applicable to jobs with such requirements, thus extending the generalizability of the strength test battery.

© All rights reserved Laughery et al. and/or Human Factors Society

1987
 
Edit | Del

Fontenelle, Gail A. (1987): A Contrast of Guideline Recommendations and Tullis's Prediction Model for Computer Displays: Should Text be Left-Justified?. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting 1987. pp. 1226-1228.

Two experiments investigated the effect of layout complexity for performance at varying levels of practice on four types of information extraction tasks. Layout complexity is defined as the number of unique horizontal and vertical starting positions of items in the display (Tullis, 1984). In the first study, layout complexity was manipulated by either left-justifying or not left-justifying text. In the second study, subject viewed a third experimental screen that displayed the starting positions of items in a completely unpredictable pattern. Moderate violations of the typical guideline recommendation that alphanumeric data be left-justified did not increase user search time across all four tasks in either the first or second study. Furthermore, severe violations of the recommendation did not increase user search time for three tasks (find label, scan data, and compare label). However, when subjects compared multiple data values, the random format did increase user search time. Though performance using the three experimental screens was comparable across the four tasks with only one exception, subjective ratings demonstrated differences between the three formats.

© All rights reserved Fontenelle and/or Human Factors Society

 
Add publication
Show this list on your homepage
 
 

Join the technology elite and advance:

 
1.

Your career

 
2.

Your network

 
 3.

Your skills

 
 
 
 
 
 

Changes to this page (author)

14 Feb 2010: Modified
25 Jun 2007: Added
25 Jun 2007: Added

Page Information

Page maintainer: The Editorial Team
URL: http://www.interaction-design.org/references/authors/gail_a__fontenelle.html
May 20

The moment clients realize that revisions are not an all-you-can-eat buffet, suddenly they realize they are not hungry.

-- Lester Beall

 
 

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

 
 

Help us help you!