About Contact Help us

Join us ! Publish !

Interaction Design Foundation

Free educational materials - made by the world's technology elite

About sponsorships

References

Edward J. Rinalducci

iPad and tablet version

Publication statistics

Pub. period:1982-2002
Pub. count:5
Number of co-authors:12

Co-authors

Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:

Kent E. Higgins:1
Stephen Cinq-Mars:1
Jannick P. Rolland:1

Productive colleagues

Edward J. Rinalducci's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:

Jannick P. Rolland:24
Daniel P. Mapes:4
Catherine Meyer:3

Calendar

May 22

Knowing (by) Designing 2013

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 20

“ The moment clients realize that revisions are not an all-you-can-eat buffet, suddenly they realize they are not hungry. ”

-- Lester Beall

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Edward J. Rinalducci

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Edward J. Rinalducci (bibliography)

2002

Edit | Del

Rolland, Jannick P., Meyer, Catherine, Arthur, K. and Rinalducci, Edward J. (2002): Method of Adjustments versus Method of Constant Stimuli in the Quantification of Accuracy and Precision of Rendered Depth in Head-Mounted Displays. In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11 (6) pp. 610-625.

1996

Edit | Del

Rinalducci, Edward J. (1996): Characteristics of Visual Fidelity in the Virtual Environment. In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5 (3) pp. 330-345.

Edit | Del

Rinalducci, Edward J., Mapes, Daniel P., Cinq-Mars, Stephen and Higgins, Kent E. (1996): Determining the Field of View in HMDs: A Psychophysical Method. In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5 (3) pp. 353-356.

1989

Edit | Del

Rinalducci, Edward J., Lassiter, Donald L., MacArthur, Mary, Piersal, James and Mitchell, Lawrence K. (1989): Further Experiments on the Effects of Foveal Load on Peripheral Vision. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting 1989. pp. 1450-1453.

“The main objective of this research was to investigate the effects of foveal load on sensitivity in the peripheral visual field. The first experiment was presented at previous meeting of the Human Factors Society. Here, foveal load was manipulated by comparing the fixation of a cross vs. a simple first-order compensatory tracking task display. Peripheral sensitivity was determined simultaneously for light flashes presented at different eccentricities along the horizontal meridian. In general, the results showed no losses in peripheral sensitivity or a "tunnel vision" effect under the experimental conditions employed. Three more experiments have been carried out since that presentation. More complex tracking tasks have been employed in order to vary foveal load and the difficulty of the perimetry task has also been manipulated in one experiment by including lights on the vertical meridian. Whether or not a loss or a gain in peripheral sensitivity depends upon the complexity of the foveal task and to some extent the perimetry task. Results are discussed in terms of arousal and resource theory.”

1982

Edit | Del

Brown, Barbara S., Dismukes, Key and Rinalducci, Edward J. (1982): Video Display Terminals and Vision of Workers: Summary and Overview of a Symposium. In Behaviour and Information Technology, 1 (2) pp. 121-140.

“This summary discusses issues raised at a National Research Council symposium on vision and VDT work, held at the request of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Symposium participants critically reviewed laboratory studies of visual function and field surveys of visual complaints of VDT operators to determine what conclusions can be drawn about the prevalence, severity, causes of, and possible remedies for reported difficulties. Although speakers' perspectives differed, a number of points appeared to gain consensus: (i) properly designed epidemiological studies comparing the incidence of visual problems in VDT operators with that in non-VDT workers are needed. (ii) Visual issues are closely interrelated with ergonomic and job design variables, and use of multivariate statistical analysis is necessary to determine what specific aspects of work involving VDTs may contribute to visual and other complaints. (iii) No scientifically valid study has establish that VDT use causes harm, in the sense of damage, to the visual system. (iv) Existing knowledge indicates a number of measures that could be taken to improve worker comfort and performance: use of high-quality displays; control of workplace lighting conditions; application of principles of anthropometric design; and consideration of workers' needs in design of jobs. (v) Surveys of radiation emissions from VDTs indicate that levels of radiation are far below U.S. occupational exposure standards. Published data provide no evidence that cateracts are associated with VDT use. (vi) Standards should be based on research. Differing opinions on whether setting standards is useful and appropriate point to the need for caution in this area. Needs for further research were identified.”

Add publication