Publication statistics
Pub. period:1992-2011
Pub. count:10
Number of co-authors:29
Co-authors
Number of publications with 3 favourite co-authors:
Anna Wichansky:2Janaki Mythily Kumar:2Arnie Lund:2 Productive colleagues
Daniel Rosenberg's 3 most productive colleagues in number of publications:
Jakob Nielsen:89Susan M. Dray:51Dennis Wixon:43
“
The moment clients realize that revisions are not an all-you-can-eat buffet, suddenly they realize they are not hungry.
”
-- Lester Beall
Featured chapter
Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann
Read Steve's chapter !
Daniel Rosenberg
Has also published under the name of:
"Dan Rosenberg"
Daniel Rosenberg is a global UX executive with the full range of skills in interaction design, usability metrics, game design and design management. He has dozens of publications in the field and is a frequently requested speaker at UX conferences and consultant.
During his period as UI Architect for Borland he invented many of the the design patterns still popular in contemporary GUI design. These include the design of the modern programming IDE and the use of "tabs" as an organizing principle for object oriented properties.
Books he has contributed to the UX field include the text book "Human Factors in Product Design" (Elsevier 1991) as well as chapters in the "Handbook of Human Computer Interaction" (Elsevier 1988), "Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency" (Academic Press 1989) and "Usability in Practice" (Academic Press 1994). He was a founding editor of ACM’s NetWorker magazine and is an active member of the interaction-design.org advisory board.
Specialties
Global User Experience, Design Management, User Interface Design, Usability Measurement, Design Thinking & UX Strategy Consulting
Image not found.
Publications by Daniel Rosenberg (bibliography)
Kumar, Janaki Mythily, Rosenberg, Daniel, Arent, Michael, Wichansky, Anna, Kolhatkar, Madhuri, Kiris, Esin, Wilson, Russell and Lund, Arnold (2011): User experience management post mergers and acquisitions. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2011. pp. 355-358.
“This panel will discuss the prominent trend of business consolidations in the enterprise software industry and proffer best practice management techniques for user experience teams following a successfully achieved merger or acquisition. Our panelists are UX managers who have experienced multiple mergers or acquisitions and will represent both the acquiring and acquired companies' perspectives. This panel builds on the success of a SIG organized at CH 2010. It will focus in on the UX management aspect post M&A, since this was most interesting to our audience. We will discuss design and technical challenges such as multiple UI technologies and platforms, navigation paradigms and menu structures, interaction behaviors, visual designs, as well as cultural and organizational challenges such as different maturity levels of UX teams, User Centered Design practices, job titles, talent management, geographical distribution and other cultural differences. Our goal is to explore best practice solutions that could help other UX managers facing similar challenges.”
© All rights reserved Kumar et al. and/or their publisher
Jain, Jhilmil, Courage, Catherine, Innes, Jon, Churchill, Elizabeth, Lund, Arnie and Rosenberg, Daniel (2011): Managing global UX teams. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2011. pp. 527-530.
“In this interactive session a panel of experts from industry, consultancy and research labs will discuss emerging issues and unique challenges related to managing global user experience teams, and how these differ from other disciplines such as marketing, sales, engineering etc.”
© All rights reserved Jain et al. and/or their publisher
Rosenberg, Daniel and Kumar, Janaki (2011): Interactions Magazine: Leading Global UX Teams. In Interactions Magazine, 18 (6) .
Kumar, Janaki Mythily, Rosenberg, Daniel, Arent, Michael, Wichansky, Anna, Kolhatkar, Madhuri, Longoria, Roman, Hendrich, Bob and Lund, Arnie (2010): Sig: branding the changing enterprise -- impact of mergers & acquisitions on user experience organizations. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2010 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010. pp. 3171-3174.
“Mergers and acquisitions are becoming increasingly common in the enterprise software world. For example, SAP acquired Business Objects, Oracle acquired PeopleSoft and CA acquired Cassatt in recent times. While this is a business expansion strategy for the acquiring company, it presents a challenge for UX professionals in both the acquiring and acquired companies, who are responsible for branding the look and feel of the newly combined business entity. This SIG examines the design, technical and cultural challenges facing a UX practitioner from the acquiring as well as acquired company's perspectives. We will explore possible best practice solutions that can help other UX professionals facing similar challenges.”
© All rights reserved Kumar et al. and/or their publisher
Andre, Anthony D., Elkerton, Jay, Portigal, Steve, Ratzlaff, Cordell, Saffer, Dan and Rosenberg, Daniel (2010): Blasphemy or Pragmatics When NOT to Follow User-Centered Design Techniques. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting 2010. p. 766.
“This invited panel brings together several high-profile members of the HCI community for an exciting, if not controversial, discussion and debate. Each is well versed in the principles and best practices of user-centered design, user experience research, and design innovation. How do they respond to the emerging topic of when NOT to use conventional user-centered design techniques? Are those who suggest this just stirring up controversy? Or are there pragmatic business constraints that require us to sometimes divert from our established practices? Our panelists will address this provocative issue as well as other contemporary issues that are at the forefront of HCI. Come and join us for what is sure to be an educational and stimulating session that could change your future approach to user-centered design and user experience research.”
© All rights reserved Andre et al. and/or HFES
Rosenberg, Daniel (2007): Introducing the 360° view of UX management. In Interactions, 14 (3) pp. 22-24.
Rosenberg, Daniel (2006): Revisiting tangible speculation: 20 years of UI prototyping. In Interactions, 13 (1) pp. 31-32.
Dray, Susan M., Karat, Clare-Marie, Rosenberg, Daniel, Siegel, David A. and Wixon, Dennis (2005): Is ROI an effective approach for persuading decision-makers of the value of user-centered design?. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2005. pp. 1168-1169.
“This panel examines the utility and effectiveness of various ways of making the business case for user-centered design (UCD). Most of the discussion in our field has assumed that measuring and demonstrating ROI for usability is the key to this effort. However, experience shows that the most brilliant ROI analysis may not win the day in the real world of business. Our panelists range from people who claim that ROI is an important persuasive tool as long as the communication about ROI is happening within a healthy business relationship, to people who claim that a focus on ROI can actually be destructive. We also explore the idea that there are important business contexts where ROI simply does not fit. Through the presentations by the panelists and through discussion of a business case scenario, we explore some alternatives to ROI in making the business case for user-centered design.”
© All rights reserved Dray et al. and/or ACM Press
Rosenberg, Daniel (2004): The myths of usability ROI. In Interactions, 11 (5) pp. 22-29.
“As I have followed the ongoing discussion in our field about usability ROI, I have consistently had the feeling that this debate is taking place on a different planet than the one I am familiar with. From my perspective, as an executive overseeing the user experience (UE) group at the world's second largest software company, much of this debate is based on misconceptions. As I stated in a recent talk at Xerox PARC hosted by BayCHI [7], in my 20 plus years of experience, I have never been asked to produce an ROI analysis.”
© All rights reserved Rosenberg and/or Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Mulligan, Robert M., Dieli, Mary, Nielsen, Jakob, Poltrock, Steven, Rosenberg, Daniel and Rudman, Susan Ehrlich (1992): Designing Usable Systems Under Real-World Constraints: A Practitioners Forum. In: Bauersfeld, Penny, Bennett, John and Lynch, Gene (eds.) Proceedings of the ACM CHI 92 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference June 3-7, 1992, Monterey, California. pp. 149-152.
Show this list on your homepage
Copyright legend
- Pd:
Public Domain (information that is common property and contains no original authorship)
Legal Code (full licence text): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain - CompositeWorkWithMultipleCopyrightTerms:
Work that is derived from or composed of multiple works with varying copyright terms and/or copyright holders - FairUse:
Copyrighted materials that meet the legal criteria for Fair Use when used by the Interaction Design FoundationThe most common cases of Fair Use are: 1) Cover art: Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary). 2) Team and corporate logos: For identification. 3) Other promotional material: Posters, programs, billboards, ads: For critical commentary. 4) Film and television screen shots: For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television. 5) Screenshots from software products: For critical commentary. 6) Paintings and other works of visual art: For critical commentary, including images illustrative of a particular technique or school. 7) Images with iconic status or historical importance: As subjects of commentary. 8) Images that are themselves subject of commentary.
Legal Code (full licence text): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use - AllRightsReservedUsedWithoutPermission:
All Rights Reserved. Non-free, copyrighted materials used without permission. The materials are used without permission of the copyright holder because the materials meet the legal criteria for Fair Use and/or because The Interaction Design Foundation has not been able to contact the copyright holder. The most common cases of Fair Use are: 1) Cover art: Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary). 2) Team and corporate logos: For identification. 3) Other promotional material: Posters, programs, billboards, ads: For critical commentary. 4) Film and television screen shots: For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television. 5) Screenshots from software products: For critical commentary. 6) Paintings and other works of visual art: For critical commentary, including images illustrative of a particular technique or school. 7) Images with iconic status or historical importance: As subjects of commentary. 8) Images that are themselves subject of commentary. - AllRightsReserved:
All Rights Reserved. Materials used with permission. Permission to use has been granted exclusively to The Interaction Design Foundation and/or the author of the given work/chapter, in which the copyrighted material is used. This permission constitutes a non-transferable license and, as such, only applies to The Interaction Design Foundation. Therefore, no part of this material may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright holder. - CC-Att-1:
Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ - CC-Att-3:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ - CC-Att-2:
Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ - CC-Att:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ - CC-Att-ND-3:
Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - CC-Att-ND-2:
Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/ - CC-Att-ND-1:
Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 1.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/1.0/ - CC-Att-ND:
Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - CC-Att-SA-1:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 1.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/ - CC-Att-SA-3:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ - CC-Att-SA-2:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ - CC-Att-SA:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
Legal Code (full licence text): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ - Unknown:
Copyright status unknown
dd
Join the technology elite and advance:
Changes to this page (author)
22 Apr 2013: Added19 Sep 2012: Modified18 Sep 2012: Modified
18 Sep 2012: Modified
30 Jul 2012: Modified
05 Jul 2011: Added
05 Jul 2011: Added
16 Jan 2011: Added
02 Nov 2010: Added
18 Mar 2010: Modified
18 Mar 2010: Modified
25 Feb 2010: Modified
18 Feb 2010: Modified
12 May 2008: Added
29 Jun 2007: Added
29 Jun 2007: Added
29 Jun 2007: Added
28 Apr 2003: Added
Page Information
Page maintainer:
The Editorial Team
URL: http://www.interaction-design.org/references/authors/daniel_rosenberg.html
Log in !
