Danae Stanton Fraser
About the author:
No description available of Danae Stanton Fraser...
Publications by Danae Stanton Fraser (bibliography)
» 2008 «
Jay, Tim and Fraser, Danae Stanton (2008): The role of a cohort in the design and evaluation of pervasive systems. In: Proceedings of DIS08 Designing Interactive Systems 2008. pp. 31-39. Available online
In this paper, we describe a new methodology for the design and evaluation of pervasive systems. We have recruited a cohort of 30 participants who are engaging with an interdisciplinary pervasive computing project Cityware over 3 years. The cohort has been selected in order to represent a broad mix of ages and technological abilities so as to increase the ecological validity of evaluation of systems and applications developed in Cityware. We discuss some of the techniques and methods that we have been able to employ as a result of maintaining this group of participants and illustrate how their data feeds into Cityware studies and applications. While the costs of recruiting and maintaining a cohort such as this are relatively high, the benefits in terms of the depth, richness and validity of results produced in this way are considered to be significant. We discuss this in terms of the potential for new designs, the type of data one can collect and engagement within the city.
Copyrights may apply
Kanjo, Eiman, Benford, Steve, Paxton, Mark, Chamberlain, Alan, Fraser, Danae Stanton, Woodgate, Dawn, Crellin, David and Woolard, Adrian (2008): MobGeoSen: facilitating personal geosensor data collection and visualization using mobile phones. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12 (8) pp. 599-607
» 2007 «
Seager, Will and Fraser, Danae Stanton (2007): Comparing physical, automatic and manual map rotation for pedestrian navigation. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007. pp. 767-776. Available online
It is well-established finding that people find maps easier to use when they are aligned so that "up" on the map corresponds to the user's forward direction. With map-based applications on handheld mobile devices, this forward/up correspondence can be maintained in several ways: the device can be physically rotated within the user's hands or the user can manually operate buttons to digitally rotate the map; alternatively, the map can be rotated automatically using data from an electronic compass. This paper examines all three options. In a field experiment, each method is compared against a baseline north-up condition. The study provides strong evidence that physical rotation is the most effective with applications that present the user with a wider map. The paper concludes with some suggestions for design improvements.
Copyrights may apply
Kirk, David, Rodden, Tom and Fraser, Danae Stanton (2007): Turn it THIS way: grounding collaborative action with remote gestures. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007. pp. 1039-1048. Available online
Remote gesture systems have been shown to provide a significant enhancement to performance in collaborative physical tasks, an effect ascribed to the ability of remote gestures to help ground deictic references. The argument that this effect works by replacing complex referential descriptions with simple pointing behaviours has been drawn into question by recent research. In this paper we significantly unpack the effects of remote gesturing on collaborative language, arguing for a more complex role for remote gestures in interaction. We demonstrate how remote gestures influence the structure of collaborative discourse, and how their use can also influence the temporal nature of the grounding process. Through generating a deeper understanding of these effects of remote gesturing on collaborative language we derive implications for the development and deployment of these technologies.
Copyrights may apply
» 2006 «
Kirk, David and Fraser, Danae Stanton (2006): Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006. pp. 1191-1200. Available online
The design of remote gesturing technologies is an area of growing interest. Current technologies have taken differing approaches to the representation of remote gesture. It is not clear which approach has the most benefit to task performance. This study therefore compared performance in a collaborative physical (assembly) task using remote gesture systems constructed with combinations of three different gesture formats (unmediated hands only, hands and sketch and digital sketch only) and two different gesture output locations (direct projection into a worker's task space or on an external monitor). Results indicated that gesturing with an unmediated representation of the hands leads to faster performance with no loss of accuracy. Comparison of gesture output locations did not find a significant difference between projecting gestures and presenting them on external monitors. These results are discussed in relation to theories of conversational grounding and the design of technologies from a 'mixed ecologies' perspective.
Copyrights may apply
O'Neill, Eamonn, Kostakos, Vassilis, Kindberg, Tim, Schieck, Ava Fatah gen., Penn, Alan, Fraser, Danae Stanton and Jones, Tim (2006): Instrumenting the City: Developing Methods for Observing and Understanding the Digital Cityscape. In: Dourish, Paul and Friday, Adrian (eds.) UbiComp 2006 Ubiquitous Computing - 8th International Conference September 17-21, 2006, Orange County, CA, USA. pp. 315-332. Available online
» 2005 «
Rogers, Yvonne, Price, Sara, Randell, Cliff, Fraser, Danae Stanton, Weal, Mark J. and Fitzpatrick, Geraldine (2005): Ubi-learning integrates indoor and outdoor experiences. In Communications of the ACM, 48 (1) pp. 55-59
SHOW THIS LIST ON YOUR HOMEPAGE
What do YOU think?
Give us your opinion! Do you have any comments/additions that you would like other visitors to see?
You say:
Mar 15th, 2010
Changes to this page (author)
27 Feb 2010: Enabled abstracts to be shown on Danae Stanton Fraser's author page.18 Aug 2009: Author was edited 31 May 2009: Author was edited
30 May 2009: Author was edited
07 Apr 2009: Author was edited
19 Jun 2007: Author was edited
19 Jun 2007: Author was edited
19 Jun 2007: Author was added to the bibliography