Calendar

May 27

13th Intl. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

May 28

Graphics Interface 2013

May 29

Boston UXPA Usability and UX Conf. 2013

May 25

“ Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them. ”

-- Alfred North Whitehead

Share this quote on...
Get more quotes via RSS or by joining our Usability Quote of the Day Facebook Page

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

Help us help you!

Spread the word:
Donate
Other ways to help

Charles J. Worringham

Add description

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Rename / change spelling

Add publication

← Button will not work: You have not enabled Javascript. How do I enable it?

Publications by Charles J. Worringham (bibliography)

1992

Edit | Del

Beringer, Dennis B. and Worringham, Charles J. (1992): Control/Response Compatibility, Muscle Synergy and the Virtual Visual Field: What You See Is What You Get. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting 1992. pp. 960-964.

“Three components were hypothesized which could affect operator response in the manual control of a system. These included muscle synergy compatibility (MS), geographic control/display compatibility (CD), and visual-field compatibility (VF). Disruption in one of these was suspected as a contributing factor in documented accident cases. A 2x2x2 between-subjects factorial design was used to evaluate all combinations of compatible and incompatible arrangements based upon these variables, using 64 undergraduate students as participants. A static-target acquisition task was used in which subjects manipulated a specially designed joystick to move a cursor to defined target locations. Performance measures included reaction time, movement time, homing time, and frequency and magnitude of directional reversals. Results indicated that visual field (VFJ compatibility/incompatibility significantly influenced reaction time, homing time, and reversal frequency and magnitude, while CD and MS manipulations had no significant main effects on performance. Significant gender effects were also found. The results of this study suggest that compatibility of control input and system response is judged primarily by direction of movement in the virtual visual field (self reference). This has implications for the design of systems such as small mobile cranes where the operator may be repositioned relative to a fixed directional control.”

Add publication