May 22

User error: replace user and press any key to continue.

-- Popular computer one-liner

 
 

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

 
 

Help us help you!

 
 

Ann Marie Vosburgh

Add description
Add publication

Publications by Ann Marie Vosburgh (bibliography)

 what's this?
1989
 
Edit | Del

Brown, Norman R. and Vosburgh, Ann Marie (1989): Evaluating the Accuracy of a Large-Vocabulary Speech Recognition System. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting 1989. pp. 296-300.

The Tangora is a large-vocabulary, speaker-dependent, isolated-word speech recognition system. In this paper, we describe a study designed to test this system under a broader range of conditions than had previously been considered. The experiment itself consisted of four experimental sessions: Sessions 1 and 4 were enrollment sessions, and Sessions 2 and 3 were test sessions. During each test session, participants read 32 preselected sentences and dictated 40 sentences of their own composition The results of this experiment indicated that (a) there was a high degree of inter-subject variability and a high degree of intra-subject consistency; (b) users did not improve with limited experience; (c) the style/content of the test sentences affected recognition performance; (d) recognition errors were more common following misrecognized words than following correctly recognized words; and (e) new users had little difficulty with isolated-word speech. We discuss the implications that these findings have for application selection, interface design, user training, and system evaluation.

© All rights reserved Brown and Vosburgh and/or Human Factors Society

1988
 
Edit | Del

Gould, John D., Boies, Stephen J., Meluson, Mia, Rasamny, Marwan and Vosburgh, Ann Marie (1988): Empirical Evaluation of Entry and Selection Methods for Specifying Dates. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting 1988. pp. 279-283.

Experienced and inexperienced computer users used seven different interaction methods to specify dates of events. Key results were that the three entry methods were faster, more accurate, and preferred over the four selection methods -- by both experienced and inexperienced computer users. The rank order of performance with these methods was about the same for both groups. Number of keystrokes required by each method was a good predictor of performance time. For selection tasks, decomposing them into separate fields is advisable.

© All rights reserved Gould et al. and/or Human Factors Society

 
Add publication
Show this list on your homepage
 
 

Join the technology elite and advance:

 
1.

Your career

 
2.

Your network

 
 3.

Your skills

 
 
 
 
 
 

Changes to this page (author)

15 Feb 2010: Modified
26 Jun 2007: Added
25 Jun 2007: Added

Page Information

Page maintainer: The Editorial Team
URL: http://www.interaction-design.org/references/authors/ann_marie_vosburgh.html
May 22

User error: replace user and press any key to continue.

-- Popular computer one-liner

 
 

Featured chapter

Read the fascinating history of Wearable Computing, told by its father, Steve Mann

Read Steve's chapter !

 
 

Help us help you!